On 11/21/06, James Carlson <james.d.carlson at sun.com> wrote: > Josh Hurst writes: > > I don't want to join the trolling, but I think there is a problem with > > the "partnership". Roland and Glenn are doing all the work but I can't > > remember if Sun ever contributed code. I see many TO DO charts, lists, > > ARC case materials, plans, drafts and requests to correct code coming > > from Sun but no code, patches or even attempts to provide working > > solutions. This does not look fair. > > Color me baffled. > > Project teams consist of the folks who are doing the work. That > doesn't give them license to draft others into doing the work. > > Are you suggesting that only open projects with Sun people on them are > "legitimate?" no
> Or are you suggesting that reviewers must not submit > comments unless they're willing to fix the code? no > Or that projects > should be able to integrate without receiving comments from anyone > outside of the project team? no > Or that code review comments must > consist of diffs? This may be nice > > Or perhaps something else? What would be "fair?" Fair may be to start submitting some patches. Just some. Just to avoid the impression that this project was done using slave labor -- Josh
