James Carlson wrote: [snip] > The project team chose to go into ON rather than some other more > suitable consolidation such as SFW.
Grumpf... we had this discussion and I thought we solved this detail a _year_ ago. We had this discussion _multiple_ times and again: SFW is _unsuited_ for ksh93. I explaind the reasons for that multiple times. How many times should I repeat myself ? <insert-smiley-for-battered-engineer-sulking-around> ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 (;O/ \/ \O;)
