On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Peter Memishian wrote:
>
> > No - no more "philosophical argument"s - if you want to ask "for
> > consistency" - then make the bloody changes yourself. As I said - it
> > would take you less time to make the changes than to type a stupid
> > email requesting them.
>
> It is not my role as a code reviewer to go and make the changes -- nor do
> I think it is appropriate. Several people -- and Roland in particular --
> explicitly asked me to review the Makefiles, and I am doing that.
> Further, I am doing it in my own personal time, which -- contrary to your
> assertions -- is actually quite limited. It is *because* I believe ksh93
> *is* important that I am spending Friday evening working on it. Frankly,
> it's quite distressing to realize that my efforts are instead viewed as
> "obstructionist".
OK. I had a phone call from jbeck and we had a very productive
discussion and he was able to "defuse" my frustrations while still
taking note of my point of view.
So I'm ready to drop this thread - with sincere thanks to everyone who
took the time to discuss it.
> PS. I'd really rather not consume more time on this thread.
Yes - I hear and understand that!
Regards,
Al Hopper Logical Approach Inc, Plano, TX. al at logical-approach.com
Voice: 972.379.2133 Fax: 972.379.2134 Timezone: US CDT
OpenSolaris Governing Board (OGB) Member - Apr 2005 to Mar 2007
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/ogb/ogb_2005-2007/
