P Zoltan wrote: > ... and another note on QuickMatrix and QuickVector: the operators > defined on these look like a good candidate for sources of bugs. I'd > prefer to change the operators to some methods with same functionality and > intiutive names. Opinions?
Could you be more specific? I'm fairly confident that they aren't actually buggy, at least I'm not tracking any bugs in either of those classes at present. The bug I mentioned earlier in the week is in the LU decomposition engine. -- New president: Here we go again... Chemistry.com: A total rip-off. Powers are not rights. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Ktechlab-devel mailing list Ktechlab-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ktechlab-devel
