Exactly ;) On Mon, 06 Jul 2009 09:16:26 +0200, Drew Noakes <drewnoa...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> I think Zoltan was referring to the idea that operator overloading can > be confusing for users of the code, and therefore create bugs in calling > code even if the operators perform exactly as they were designed to. > > Hence the suggestion to refactor the code so that explicit method names > were used instead. > > > > ________________________________ > From: Alan Grimes <agri...@speakeasy.net> > To: ktechlab-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Sent: Monday, 6 July, 2009 3:04:59 > Subject: Re: [Ktechlab-devel] QMatrix - Random number generation > > P Zoltan wrote: >> ... and another note on QuickMatrix and QuickVector: the operators >> defined on these look like a good candidate for sources of bugs. I'd >> prefer to change the operators to some methods with same functionality >> and >> intiutive names. Opinions? > > Could you be more specific? > > I'm fairly confident that they aren't actually buggy, at least I'm not > tracking any bugs in either of those classes at present. The bug I > mentioned earlier in the week is in the LU decomposition engine. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Ktechlab-devel mailing list Ktechlab-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ktechlab-devel
