On Thursday, November 9, 2017, <zoltan.zv...@gmail.com> wrote: > We measured that we lose at least one order of magnitude in terms of > latency, which is our key KPI in this setup.
Which is the comparison here? Shared mem vs what? If your architecture doesn't support apps to be run on different nodes and communicate via network (**any** network that you can have), then you are probably pretty limited and should re think stuff or just use a hot/standby setup. Maybe use a LOT co-location (but that can be out of control if not done carefully), etc. Except there is a benchmark for something specific on the network needed for Kubernetes/containers, that it's not hit when not using Kubernetes/containers, this seems like a more general issue to me. Am I missing something? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kubernetes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to kubernetes-users@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/kubernetes-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
