Laurent Vivier wrote: > Avi Kivity wrote: >> Laurent Vivier wrote: >>> To improve readability, move push, writeback, and grp 1a/2/3/4/5 >>> emulation parts to functions. >>> +static inline int emulate_grp45(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, >>> + struct x86_emulate_ops *ops, >>> + unsigned long *_eflags, >>> + int *no_wb) >>> >> >> If you move _eflags and no_wb to the decode cache (in a separate >> patch) then this patch can be much nicer. > > I agree but this increases the size of the structure shared with the > userspace with variable used only locally in x86_emulate.c, is it > acceptable ? >
It isn't shared with userspace, just part of the vcpu. Looking a bit more, eflags is already present in x86_emulate_ctxt (and could be moved from there), and no_wb can be merged into opcode_table and twobyte_opcode_table, so long term there is no size change. -- Any sufficiently difficult bug is indistinguishable from a feature. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel