On 10/15/07, Carsten Otte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > With VT you can attempt to make that invisible to the guest using the > > tsc offset field. Probably svm can do that too (didn't check docs > > though). kvm-lite can't (what is the status btw?). Xen "solves" that > > by not doing power management *evil grin*. > On s390, we've had an instruction for that ever since (store clock), > that works with an offset field with hardware support. Works great for us. I've heard s390 also have some special instructions to solve the halting problem. ;-)
> If VT and SVM can do the same, I'd vote for using it if we can. I was in the opposite side of gerd: I knew svm did it, not sure about vt ;-) -- Glauber de Oliveira Costa. "Free as in Freedom" http://glommer.net "The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act." ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
