[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hollis Blanchard wrote:
>> That's a good point, but does PIT/HPET emulation show up as a hot
>> spot in any profiles? I think keeping the hypercall API as small as
>> feasible is a desirable design goal. 
>> 
> 
> At the moment I think not.  Even a dyntick kernel would only require a
> few thousands exits per second worst case.
> 
Yes, the key issue is old PIT IRQ handler which is not very
virtualization
friendly.
Eddie

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to