On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 09:00 -0700, Alex Williamson wrote: > Hi Xiantao, > > Perhaps more people would be able to help restructure the tree to > support more architectures if a snapshot of the kvm/ia64 code was made > available. We might want to think about a kvm-ia64-devel mailing list > too (such as ppc has already). Thanks, > > Alex
I agree. My branch of the Gelato Federation (http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/) wants to invest time and effort into IA64 KVM which could mean helping with a merge, streamlining code, benchmarking, bug hunting or something else along those lines. We've already got an open source Itanium virtualization solution called Linux on Linux (http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/IA64wiki/LinuxOnLinux) and we were hoping to apply what knowledge we gained from that project into something different. Currently we can't really do anything to help since there is supposed to be a working port but we can't get to it. Anyway, I'm currently being payed to improve Itanium virtualization under Linux, is there anything useful I can do here or should I just stick with working on LoL? During the last few days I've been attempting to take out the x86 specific stuff from kvm_main.c but I see that Xiantao already submitted that change yesterday. Do you Intel guys have it all under control now? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
