On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 10:41:07AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > Avi Kivity wrote: > > > > Exactly. But it is better to be explicit about it and pass the page > > directly like you did before. I hate to make you go back-and-fourth, > > but I did not understand the issue completely before. > > > > btw, the call to gfn_to_page() can happen in page_fault() instead of > walk_addr(); that will reduce the amount of error handling, and will > simplify the callers to walk_addr() that don't need the page.
But the gfn in question is only known at walk_addr() time, so thats not possible. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
