On Feb 27, 2008, at 5:59 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:

> Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>> A static library  + headers (i.e. libfdt-devel.rpm) could have been
>>> used, though Linux avoids external dependencies.
>>>
>>
>> Why don't you try to talk to the other possible users and create a   
>> version of the library, that at least can be packaged, even though  
>> for  now KVM would be the only user? Maybe others (unlikely Linux,  
>> maybe  Xen, probably dtc) would like to have a central library for  
>> device  trees too.
>>
>
> ["you" == the ppc folk]
>
> Good idea.  I can provide the rpm (and a tarball for non-rpm users)  
> on the sourceforge download site until it is upstreamed into the  
> distros.  Most distros now allow external package maintainers, so it  
> shouldn't be too difficult to get it accepted.

I can get this in for SUSE. You could make it really easy for me if  
you put this on the SUSE build service, so I can just take the package  
from there and put it into the distro.

> Presumably the library will only rarely change.

I hope so ;-). But then again if every user maintained its own version  
until now, I guess there are not that many changes.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to