Am Freitag, 1. August 2008 schrieb Daniel P. Berrange: > What are your intentions for this part longer term. Are you planning to > create a QEMU target for s390 so we can use real QEMU binaries instead > of emulating a subset of its features. If s390 userspace were QEMU based > them you'd be able to use libvirt as a management API in same way as > the other architectures.
Yes, the goal is to move towards qemu. kuli is not intended as a long term solution. Consider it a proof of concept/testing code to show that the kernel part is working. You can also look at our KVM Forum presentation: http://kvm.qumranet.com/kvmwiki/KvmForum2008?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=kdf2008_17.pdf The slide "Next step" contains the merge into common kvm userspace. I dont think we will see a full s390 backend just to make kvm work. We are considering Anthonys proposal for an kvm backend in qemu instead. Christian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
