Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 14:17 +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
+static void virtio_pci_release_dev(struct device *dev)
+{
+}
+
/* A PCI device has it's own struct device and so does a virtio device so
* we create a place for the virtio devices to show up in sysfs. I think it
* would make more sense for virtio to not insist on having it's own device. */
static struct device virtio_pci_root = {
.parent = NULL,
.bus_id = "virtio-pci",
+ .release = virtio_pci_release_dev,
};
Actually, we should be able to delete this virtio_pci_root entirely.
The device is a dummy one anyway.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
/* Convert a generic virtio device to our structure */
@@ -328,6 +333,7 @@ static int __devinit virtio_pci_probe(struct pci_dev
*pci_dev,
return -ENOMEM;
vp_dev->vdev.dev.parent = &virtio_pci_root;
+ vp_dev->vdev.dev.release = virtio_pci_release_dev;
vp_dev->vdev.config = &virtio_pci_config_ops;
vp_dev->pci_dev = pci_dev;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vp_dev->virtqueues);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
