On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 08:43 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > Apparently we shouldn't be statically allocating the root device
> > object, so dynamically allocate it instead.
> >
> > Also add a release() function to avoid this warning:
> >
> > Device 'virtio-pci' does not have a release() function, it is broken and
> > must be fixed
> >
>
> Is it really better to dynamically allocate the root device than
> statically allocate it? Is the advice that we shouldn't statically
> allocate a device really a suggestion that if you're doing that, you're
> using struct device wrong?
There are other statically allocated devices in tree[1]. It seems this
is actively discouraged, though.
AFAICT, the platform_bus device is there for a similar reason to ours -
i.e. to group devices together in sysfs.
> If so, this conversion should be equally wrong. Have you chosen to keep
> this device so that your initrd work-around continues to work as-is?
I choose to keep it because:
a) I'm trying to fix the warning spew from 'rmmod virtio_pci' without
breaking anything else
b) The grouping under /sys/devices/{virtio-pci,lguest,kvm_s390} is
useful IMHO and there are precedents (e.g. /sys/devices/platform)
c) It's better to not gratuitously move stuff around where we know it
will break something
> What exactly is the work around and is there a less hackish way we could
> support it?
Being discussed elsewhere in the thread.
Cheers,
Mark.
[1] - git-grep 'struct device .* = {' next-20081204
next-20081204:arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/iop_fw_load.c:static struct device
iop_spu_device[2] = {
next-20081204:arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/iop_fw_load.c:static struct device
iop_mpu_device = {
next-20081204:arch/ia64/kernel/pci-dma.c:struct device fallback_dev = {
next-20081204:arch/parisc/kernel/drivers.c:static struct device root = {
next-20081204:arch/powerpc/kernel/ibmebus.c:static struct device
ibmebus_bus_device = { /* fake "parent" device */
next-20081204:arch/powerpc/platforms/ps3/system-bus.c:static struct device
ps3_system_bus = {
next-20081204:arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c:struct device x86_dma_fallback_dev = {
next-20081204:drivers/base/isa.c:static struct device isa_bus = {
next-20081204:drivers/base/platform.c:struct device platform_bus = {
next-20081204:drivers/idle/i7300_idle.c:static struct device dummy_dma_dev = {
next-20081204:drivers/ieee1394/nodemgr.c:static struct device
nodemgr_dev_template_ud = {
next-20081204:drivers/ieee1394/nodemgr.c:static struct device
nodemgr_dev_template_ne = {
next-20081204:drivers/ieee1394/nodemgr.c:struct device
nodemgr_dev_template_host = {
next-20081204:drivers/lguest/lguest_device.c:static struct device lguest_root =
{
next-20081204:drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grumain.c:static struct device gru_device = {
next-20081204:drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xp_main.c:struct device xp_dbg_subname = {
next-20081204:drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_main.c:struct device xpc_part_dbg_subname
= {
next-20081204:drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_main.c:struct device xpc_chan_dbg_subname
= {
next-20081204:drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpnet.c:struct device xpnet_dbg_subname = {
...
next-20081204:drivers/rapidio/rio-driver.c:static struct device rio_bus = {
next-20081204:drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c:static struct device pseudo_primary = {
next-20081204:drivers/sh/maple/maple.c:static struct device maple_bus = {
next-20081204:drivers/sh/superhyway/superhyway.c:static struct device
superhyway_bus_device = {
next-20081204:drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c:static struct device virtio_pci_root
= {
next-20081204:drivers/w1/w1.c:struct device w1_master_device = {
next-20081204:drivers/w1/w1.c:struct device w1_slave_device = {
next-20081204:samples/firmware_class/firmware_sample_driver.c:static struct
device ghost_device = {
next-20081204:samples/firmware_class/firmware_sample_firmware_class.c:static
struct device my_device = {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
