Il 16/01/2014 16:12, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
>> > I'm applying patches 1-10 (for now to kvm/queue).
>> > 
>> > For the last two, I prefer to wait for 3.15.
> Should we disable the broken features in 3.14?

I was thinking about it---which would have meant applying patches 1-8 only.

In the end I decided not to do it because the patch doesn't affect
KVM-on-KVM emulation.  If the patch already helped you in developing
Jailhouse, so the feature must not be _completely_ broken.  So the churn
of reverting the feature now and reapplying it later is not warranted, IMO.

Thanks,

Paolo

>> > 
>> > Also, for patch 11 I would really prefer to use check_nested_events for
>> > both VMX and SVM.  I will look at SVM next week.
> OK, thanks. I will send an updated patch 11 and also a patch on top of 4
> to read the physical bit width from the guest cpuid.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to