Hi Jingyi,
This patch has quite a long summary. How about instead of
arm64: microbench: Use the funcions for ipi test as the general functions for
gic(ipi/lpi/timer) test
we use
arm64: microbench: Generalize ipi test names
and then in the commit message, instead of
The following patches will use that.
we use
Later patches will use these functions for gic(ipi/lpi/timer) tests.
Thanks,
drew
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 11:01:26AM +0800, Jingyi Wang wrote:
> The following patches will use that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <wangjingy...@huawei.com>
> ---
> arm/micro-bench.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arm/micro-bench.c b/arm/micro-bench.c
> index 794dfac..fc4d356 100644
> --- a/arm/micro-bench.c
> +++ b/arm/micro-bench.c
> @@ -25,24 +25,24 @@
>
> static u32 cntfrq;
>
> -static volatile bool ipi_ready, ipi_received;
> +static volatile bool irq_ready, irq_received;
> static void *vgic_dist_base;
> static void (*write_eoir)(u32 irqstat);
>
> -static void ipi_irq_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +static void gic_irq_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> - ipi_ready = false;
> - ipi_received = true;
> + irq_ready = false;
> + irq_received = true;
> gic_write_eoir(gic_read_iar());
> - ipi_ready = true;
> + irq_ready = true;
> }
>
> -static void ipi_secondary_entry(void *data)
> +static void gic_secondary_entry(void *data)
> {
> - install_irq_handler(EL1H_IRQ, ipi_irq_handler);
> + install_irq_handler(EL1H_IRQ, gic_irq_handler);
> gic_enable_defaults();
> local_irq_enable();
> - ipi_ready = true;
> + irq_ready = true;
> while (true)
> cpu_relax();
> }
> @@ -72,9 +72,9 @@ static bool test_init(void)
> break;
> }
>
> - ipi_ready = false;
> + irq_ready = false;
> gic_enable_defaults();
> - on_cpu_async(1, ipi_secondary_entry, NULL);
> + on_cpu_async(1, gic_secondary_entry, NULL);
>
> cntfrq = get_cntfrq();
> printf("Timer Frequency %d Hz (Output in microseconds)\n", cntfrq);
> @@ -82,13 +82,18 @@ static bool test_init(void)
> return true;
> }
>
> -static void ipi_prep(void)
> +static void gic_prep_common(void)
> {
> unsigned tries = 1 << 28;
>
> - while (!ipi_ready && tries--)
> + while (!irq_ready && tries--)
> cpu_relax();
> - assert(ipi_ready);
> + assert(irq_ready);
> +}
> +
> +static void ipi_prep(void)
> +{
> + gic_prep_common();
> }
>
> static void ipi_exec(void)
> @@ -96,17 +101,17 @@ static void ipi_exec(void)
> unsigned tries = 1 << 28;
> static int received = 0;
>
> - ipi_received = false;
> + irq_received = false;
>
> gic_ipi_send_single(1, 1);
>
> - while (!ipi_received && tries--)
> + while (!irq_received && tries--)
> cpu_relax();
>
> - if (ipi_received)
> + if (irq_received)
> ++received;
>
> - assert_msg(ipi_received, "failed to receive IPI in time, but received
> %d successfully\n", received);
> + assert_msg(irq_received, "failed to receive IPI in time, but received
> %d successfully\n", received);
> }
>
> static void hvc_exec(void)
> --
> 2.19.1
>
>
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
