Hi Jingyi,

On 7/2/20 5:01 AM, Jingyi Wang wrote:
> Besides using separate running times parameter, we add time limit
> for loop_test to make sure each test should be done in a certain
> time(5 sec here).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <wangjingy...@huawei.com>
> ---
>  arm/micro-bench.c | 17 +++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arm/micro-bench.c b/arm/micro-bench.c
> index 506d2f9..4c962b7 100644
> --- a/arm/micro-bench.c
> +++ b/arm/micro-bench.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>  #include <asm/gic-v3-its.h>
>  
>  #define NTIMES (1U << 16)
> +#define MAX_NS (5 * 1000 * 1000 * 1000UL)
>  
>  static u32 cntfrq;
>  
> @@ -258,22 +259,26 @@ static void loop_test(struct exit_test *test)
>       uint64_t start, end, total_ticks, ntimes = 0;
>       struct ns_time total_ns, avg_ns;
>  
> +     total_ticks = 0;
>       if (test->prep) {
>               if(!test->prep()) {
>                       printf("%s test skipped\n", test->name);
>                       return;
>               }
>       }
> -     isb();
> -     start = read_sysreg(cntpct_el0);
> -     while (ntimes < test->times) {
> +
> +     while (ntimes < test->times && total_ns.ns < MAX_NS) {
> +             isb();
> +             start = read_sysreg(cntpct_el0);
>               test->exec();
> +             isb();
> +             end = read_sysreg(cntpct_el0);
> +
>               ntimes++;
> +             total_ticks += (end - start);
> +             ticks_to_ns_time(total_ticks, &total_ns);
>       }
you don't need the
ticks_to_ns_time(total_ticks, &total_ns);

after the loop
> -     isb();
> -     end = read_sysreg(cntpct_el0);
>  
> -     total_ticks = end - start;
>       ticks_to_ns_time(total_ticks, &total_ns);
>       avg_ns.ns = total_ns.ns / ntimes;
>       avg_ns.ns_frac = total_ns.ns_frac / ntimes;
> 

Besides
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com>

Thanks

Eric

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to