2011.04.18. 11:54 keltezéssel, Dwayne Bailey írta: > > On 2011-04-17 23:33, André Schnabel wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Am 17.04.2011 20:59, schrieb Andras Timar: >>> >>> >>>> I also suggest removing version number from the name of the projects, >>>> because it has several benefits. One of them is preserving >>>> contribution statistics of the project. >>> That's a good point. Statistics are important. I wonder what others >>> think. >> >> I wonder why it should be important for the statistics if we have >> Version numbers in the project or not. If someone is actually doing a >> translation this is counted - and that is what matters (regardless of >> the version she contributed to). > By using project names such as "libo-current-ui" and "libo-next-ui" you > could achieve this statistics stability, if required. The descriptive > name of the project could then communicate that this is 3.3.x vs 3.4.x > But at some point I need to move libo-next-ui to libo-current-ui and create a new libo-next-ui. IMHO it's not a rename operation. Or is it?
Anyway, André is right, statistics per language should be enough. It would be the best, if I didn't have to change anything in our current setup. :) Thanks, Andras -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
