One thing that would also be useful is the ability of ignore accelerators. If one wants to find Open and the word is O~pen, the second won´t appear on the search.
This is definitely annoying and contra producing. This feature is a must have for search function. What do You guys think about it? > I think this is already filed as > http://bugs.locamotion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=327 ? > > > > Hi Rimas Yes, I´ve already saw this entry but I think that it´s the opposite. The title says " Ensure that searching in Pootle *takes accelerators into account" *(my bold) With this title I guess (don´t know for sure) that the accelerator must be taken in order to achieve results. What I meant was " Ensure that searching in Pootle *don´t* take accelerators into account" So when I write Open, O~pen; Op~en and Ope~n appear in search. Or am I getting this the wrong way? -- Sérgio Marques -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
