On zondag 5 februari 2012 15:32:42 Urdu Localizer wrote: > Yes, you are right about Hindi and Urdu, as both occur "mostly" in the same > geographical region. But, I think when it comes to save time, I would > prefer to use Google Translate for English > Urdu translation rather than > Hindi > Urdu translation. And this is because I think if go for Hindi > > Urdu translation, it will be in-fact > English > Hindi > Urdu. > I think you are getting my point that I do not want to go for a "second or > third level" translation. I want to translate directly from the root-level > language.
When using Pootle you can choose to have another language visible on the page with the text you are working on. So you can use both English and the Hindi translation to make the translation to Urdu. You can either copy the English text or the Hindi text or even part of it. My extra language, when translating from English to Dutch, is German. -- fr.gr. Freek de Kruijf -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
