On Apr 11, 2013 11:23 AM, "Andrea Pescetti" <pesce...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> Another option is to put off the push for more languages.  So with 4.0 we
>> just work to update the languages we already have, but bring in
additional
>> languages later.  This might be done as a "second edition" of 4.0, as we
>> did with the additional 3.4.1 languages.
>
>
> If we can have the new Pootle available (with no need to rush it of
course) we could consider to make the call for translators as soon as
Pootle is ready and the 4.0 files are uploaded.

Honestly as being one of those who have actually tried 2.5, dont expect too
much, with our current setup there are very few differences. The
differences will be aperant (is that the right word?) when we have genLang
and svn automatic comit in place.

>
> The consolidation of PO files does not impact very much on the
translators' workflow and I agree it can wait until after 4.0.
Well not the workflow, but very well the motivation, it is quite different
if you look at checking/editing about 240 files or just 40.

But since I cannot make the deadline, sorry for that,.

rgd
Jan I
>
>
> Regards,
>   Andrea.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: l10n-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: l10n-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>

Reply via email to