On 4/11/13 6:21 PM, janI wrote: > On Apr 11, 2013 11:23 AM, "Andrea Pescetti" <pesce...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Rob Weir wrote: >>> >>> Another option is to put off the push for more languages. So with 4.0 we >>> just work to update the languages we already have, but bring in > additional >>> languages later. This might be done as a "second edition" of 4.0, as we >>> did with the additional 3.4.1 languages. >> >> >> If we can have the new Pootle available (with no need to rush it of > course) we could consider to make the call for translators as soon as > Pootle is ready and the 4.0 files are uploaded. > > Honestly as being one of those who have actually tried 2.5, dont expect too > much, with our current setup there are very few differences. The > differences will be aperant (is that the right word?) when we have genLang > and svn automatic comit in place.
I think the completely automated svn commit have to be discussed. Do we really want it? Or is it better to have a process where we reintegrate translation on demand or on a regular basis once per month or so. Juergen > >> >> The consolidation of PO files does not impact very much on the > translators' workflow and I agree it can wait until after 4.0. > Well not the workflow, but very well the motivation, it is quite different > if you look at checking/editing about 240 files or just 40. > > But since I cannot make the deadline, sorry for that,. > > rgd > Jan I >> >> >> Regards, >> Andrea. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: l10n-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: l10n-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: l10n-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: l10n-h...@openoffice.apache.org
