Scribit Marcus Brinkmann dies 22/04/2006 hora 03:52: > Neal pointed out that ["send at least once" capability] may be > inconvenient in actual practice: If a server S wants to propagate > (forward) a request to another server T, then S must be careful to not > destroy its own copy of the reply capability before T had a chance to > reply.
I'm not familiar at all with the use of capabilities by a program, but couldn't S drop it's capability in a way that won't trigger the send that the "invoke on delete" bit asks for? Uncertainly, Nowhere man -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
