Yoav Shapira wrote: > Hi, > > On 12/4/06, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I actually have a question regarding this. Say that a project from the >> lab >> wants to enter incubation. Could it be refused based on a community >> health >> argument? And if so, what would happen to it? Should it stay in the lab? > > I'd say such a refusal is extremely unlikely. The more likely > scenario is that the project would be accepted into incubation, and > then the project would be expected to grow its community while in > incubation. An active and diverse community would then be an > incubation graduation requirement, not an entry requirement.
Correct. The only argument for the incubator would be "you don't have enough seed to even start"... but that's the labs PMC to decide that a lab is ready to move on, the incubator would probably respect that decision. In case we promote it and they rejected, a stall emerges. As all other stalls, people will talk and compromises will be reached. No reason to have rules for events that never happened and that we don't know how to model (yet). I'm all for condensing protection rules after we make the same mistakes several time, but not pre-emptively: the labs bylaws should be the smallest possible set of guidelines, not the largest possible one. -- Stefano. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
