Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
>
>...
>
> Oops, I'm sorry for my communications skills, or lack thereof. The above
> was a butchered version of the LGram draft 1 announcement, which by itself
> was not good. Here's the intro paragraph I've written about LGram on my
> web page:
>
> A project for a universal computer-communication language. It
> differs from XML in that it has no attributes and no tags and
> isn't about marking up text. Instead, nested lists are used to
> denote objects (basic elements being strings, integers, symbols,
> etc). A lot of attention is put in describing usages of that
> language within the language itself, so that you don't need
> separate "document-type definition" (DTD) nor "interface
> description" (IDL) languages to do that.
It would be useful if you could show how LGram differs not from XML, but
from Yaml, WDDX, the SOAP data encoding, the XML-RPC data encoding and
all of the other "universal" computer-communication languages. :-)
--
Paul Prescod, ActiveState
__________________________________________________
Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help?
Donate cash, emergency relief information
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/
