> On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Paul Prescod wrote:
> > It would be useful if you could show how LGram differs not from XML, but
> > from Yaml, WDDX, the SOAP data encoding, the XML-RPC data encoding and
> > all of the other "universal" computer-communication languages. :-)
I don't see why you consider comparing with XML itself not to be at
least partially appropriate.
YAML doesn't have the scope of LGRAM and doesn't have any
separately-defined higher-level layers like the three other things you
mention that go on top of XML.
I don't know how to compare LGRAM with anything else...
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
> A blurp about why it's a good idea in the first place would probably
> make it easier to get people involved.
Well I don't say it's a good idea.
But I will encourage whoever gets involved.
________________________________________________________________
Mathieu Bouchard http://hostname.2y.net/~matju
