On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Paul Prescod wrote:
> > A project for a universal computer-communication language. It
> > differs from XML in that it has no attributes and no tags and
> > isn't about marking up text. Instead, nested lists are used to
> > denote objects (basic elements being strings, integers, symbols,
> > etc). A lot of attention is put in describing usages of that
> > language within the language itself, so that you don't need
> > separate "document-type definition" (DTD) nor "interface
> > description" (IDL) languages to do that.
>
> It would be useful if you could show how LGram differs not from XML, but
> from Yaml, WDDX, the SOAP data encoding, the XML-RPC data encoding and
> all of the other "universal" computer-communication languages. :-)
A blurp about why it's a good idea in the first place would probably
make it easier to get people involved.
- ask
--
ask bjoern hansen, http://ask.netcetera.dk/ !try; do();
more than a billion impressions per week, http://valueclick.com
