Guido van Rossum writes: > > If your view on coding style makes the code impenetrable for me, I > blame you, not myself. :-) Amen!!! If you ask me, this whole API discussion gives me visions of some poor Fortran programmer huddled over their terminal trying to figure out how to cram 500 function names into a set of 6-letter identifiers. Sure, it may be short to type and if you are willing to invest 10000 hours to learn the whole system it might even be obvious. However, for the rest of us who have to go look at code like that, it's nothing but a horror--and it's sure as hell not obvious. Does *ANYONE* in their right mind actually want to maintain code that looks like this? I sure don't. I don't know anyone else who does either. -- Dave
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Guido van Rossum
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Guido van Rossum
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Donal K. Fellows
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Guido van Rossum
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? boris
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? David Beazley
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Donal K. Fellows
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dave Mitchell
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? David Cantrell
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Andrei Zmievski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Jeremy Hylton
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Nathan Torkington
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? raptor
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Guido van Rossum
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
