At 11:53 AM 9/21/2001 -0400, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>Should we really be discussing encodings this early in the game?
>Shouldn't that be a detail that is none of the engine's business (but
>belongs to the individual data type implementations)? That's the
>abstraction we strive for in Python's implementation
>(only partially successfully, for various mostly historic reasons).
Generally speaking the engine doesn't care. The string libraries do, of
course, but the engine's not that interested. It either deals with things
abstractly or as sets of sequence of integers. (For regex work, mainly)
Things are as specified as they are so that string libraries can start to
get built.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Donal K. Fellows
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- RE: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? John Wiersba
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Donal K. Fellows
- RE: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Mathieu Bouchard
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Buggs
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Guido van Rossum
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Marco Pantaleoni
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Pedroni Samuele
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Samuele Pedroni
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Guido van Rossum
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Paul Prescod
