Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot?

[Dan Sugalski]

At 06:34 PM 9/21/2001 +0200, Pedroni Samuele wrote:
>A "Parrot Python String" will not be a STRING
>but given there are STRINGs it should be
>decided how they work...

A Parrot Perl String won't be a plain STRING either. I expect both Perl and 
Python (and anyone else who wants to) will use the same underlying 
libraries and representation for plain string data. There's a limit to the 
number of times *anyone* wants to write Unicode NFD conversion routines. 
(That limit's usually 0, but someone has to do it...)

                                        Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk