At 05:22 PM 9/23/2001 -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
>On Sun, 23 Sep 2001, Simon Cozens wrote:
> > the right answer or the wrong answer. Once a language acknowledges that
> it is
> > dealing with pure, honest-to-God integers, then it is fairly easy to
> compile
> > down to integer-specific opcodes.
>
>I don't know when this situation ever happens in Perl 5.4...
foreach my $foo (1..10000) {
}
No reason $foo has to be real in many cases, and its value can certainly be
cached in an integer register, if it even needs to be a real variable when
the final code's emitted.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Guido van Rossum
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Paul Prescod
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Mathieu Bouchard
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Mathieu Bouchard
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Mathieu Bouchard
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Samuele Pedroni
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Kurt D. Starsinic
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Samuele Pedroni
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Samuele Pedroni
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Nathan Torkington
