> PMCs will bear more than a passing resemblance to PyObjects, when > implemented. The main difference is that we won't use the indirection > of a PyTypeObject, but will use a vtable pointer directly. Ah, but a PyTypeObject isn't an indirection. It *is* the vtable (with a suitable header to make it look like an object). Python objects aren't all the allocated same size. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Guido van Rossum
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Guido van Rossum
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Nathan Torkington
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Samuele Pedroni
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Guido van Rossum
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Guido van Rossum
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Guido van Rossum
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Guido van Rossum
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Samuele Pedroni
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Mathieu Bouchard
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Kurt D. Starsinic
