Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot?

[Samuele Pedroni]

Hi.

> 
> >A thing that I don't understand is the fact that results are passed
> >back through PMCs.
> 
> What in particular do you find odd about that? PMCs hold 'complex' values. 
> (Where complex is pretty much anything that corresponds to a variable in 
> most of the newer languages) Most results are, well, 'complex'. :)
> 
Ok the question was sloppy, what I was asking is way you don't have

PMC add(PMC,PMC)
or add(PMC,PMC,PMC*)

PMC is a pointer to a struct right?

regards.