On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 05:09:15PM -0400, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> The way Dan explained it to me, a PMC is the closest thing he has to
> an object.
PMCs will bear more than a passing resemblance to PyObjects, when
implemented. The main difference is that we won't use the indirection
of a PyTypeObject, but will use a vtable pointer directly.
Oh, and I'm just about to rewrite the bytecode format so that it groks
multiple types of constant, including other bytecode streams, at which point
it'll bear rather more than a passing resemblance to a PyCodeObject.
Then we might start losing the Perl people. Heee. :)
--
Will your long-winded speeches never end?
What ails you that you keep on arguing?
-- Job 16:3
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Nathan Torkington
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Guido van Rossum
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Guido van Rossum
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Nathan Torkington
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Samuele Pedroni
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Guido van Rossum
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Guido van Rossum
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Guido van Rossum
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Guido van Rossum
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
