No, not working. Not even in snv_105!

These are the relevant lines, after Automatic has been disabled, and a reboot:
(I unplugged the wired LAN before reboot, to make sure I connect through WiFi)

# ifconfig -a
lo0: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu 8232 
index 1
        inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000 
rge0: flags=201004843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DHCP,IPv4,CoS> mtu 1500 
index 2
        inet 192.168.116.61 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.116.255
        ether 0:e0:4d:30:2d:68 
lo0: flags=2002000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv6,VIRTUAL> mtu 8252 
index 1
        inet6 ::1/128 
# dladm scan-wifi rum1

# dladm connect-wifi -k psk -e wlan rum1
# ifconfig rum1 plumb

# ifconfig -a
lo0: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu 8232 
index 1
        inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000 
rge0: flags=201004843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DHCP,IPv4,CoS> mtu 1500 
index 2
        inet 192.168.116.61 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.116.255
        ether 0:e0:4d:30:2d:68 
rum1: flags=201000842<BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,CoS> mtu 1500 index 3
        inet 0.0.0.0 netmask 0 
        ether 0:21:27:c0:a8:9b 
lo0: flags=2002000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv6,VIRTUAL> mtu 8252 
index 1
        inet6 ::1/128 

# dladm scan-wifi rum1
LINK       ESSID               BSSID/IBSSID      SEC    STRENGTH   MODE   SPEED
rum1       wlan                0:13:10:7c:aa:f1  wpa    excellent  g      54Mb
rum1       aztech              0:12:e:82:cd:99   wep    excellent  g      54Mb
# ifconfig -a
lo0: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu 8232 
index 1
        inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000 
rge0: flags=201004843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DHCP,IPv4,CoS> mtu 1500 
index 2
        inet 192.168.116.61 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.116.255
        ether 0:e0:4d:30:2d:68 
rum1: flags=201000842<BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,CoS> mtu 1500 index 3
        inet 0.0.0.0 netmask 0 
        ether 0:21:27:c0:a8:9b 
lo0: flags=2002000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv6,VIRTUAL> mtu 8252 
index 1
        inet6 ::1/128 
# ifconfig rum1 plumb
ifconfig: SIOCSLIFNAME for ip: rum1: already exists
# ifconfig rum1 dhcp 
# ifconfig -a
lo0: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu 8232 
index 1
        inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000 
rge0: flags=201004843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DHCP,IPv4,CoS> mtu 1500 
index 2
        inet 192.168.116.61 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.116.255
        ether 0:e0:4d:30:2d:68 
rum1: flags=201004843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DHCP,IPv4,CoS> mtu 1500 
index 3
        inet 192.168.116.198 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.116.255
        ether 0:21:27:c0:a8:9b 
lo0: flags=2002000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv6,VIRTUAL> mtu 8252 
index 1
        inet6 ::1/128 
# ping 192.168.116.100
no answer from 192.168.116.100

# ping 192.168.116.198
192.168.116.198 is alive
# netstat -rn

Routing Table: IPv4
  Destination           Gateway           Flags  Ref     Use     Interface 
-------------------- -------------------- ----- ----- ---------- --------- 
default              192.168.116.200      UG        1          0 rge0      
default              192.168.116.200      UG        1          0 rum1      
192.168.116.0        192.168.116.61       U         1        155 rge0      
192.168.116.0        192.168.116.198      U         1          0 rum1      
127.0.0.1            127.0.0.1            UH        1        146 lo0       

Routing Table: IPv6
  Destination/Mask            Gateway                   Flags Ref   Use    If   
--------------------------- --------------------------- ----- --- ------- ----- 
::1                         ::1                         UH      1      21 lo0   
# ping 192.168.116.200
no answer from 192.168.116.200

Then I plugged back the wired LAN, and 

# ping 192.168.116.200
192.168.116.200 is alive

There are some items here that look strange:
1. The initial scan did not work
2. plumb did not give it an IP
3. It did not allow to ping its gateway
(4. nwam is still not working for it)


Uwe
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org

Reply via email to