David Lamparter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't know where this ping effect comes from, > > east: > # ip tunnel add netb mode gre remote a.b.c.e local f.g.h.i ttl 255 > # ip link set netb up > # ip addr add 192.168.0.254/32 peer 192.168.1.0/24 dev netb > > west: > # ip tunnel add neta mode gre remote f.g.h.i local a.b.c.e ttl 255 > # ip link set neta up > # ip addr add 192.168.1.254/32 peer 192.168.0.0/24 dev neta > > - *Or* another possibility: > east: > # ip tunnel add netb mode gre remote a.b.c.e local f.g.h.i ttl 255 > # ip link set netb up > # ip addr add 192.168.2.1/30 dev netb > # ip route add 192.168.1.0/24 via 192.168.2.2 dev netb > > west: > # ip tunnel add neta mode gre remote f.g.h.i local a.b.c.e ttl 255 > # ip link set neta up > # ip addr add 192.168.2.2/30 dev neta > # ip route add 192.168.0.0/24 via 192.168.2.1 dev neta
Tried both of these, am still seeing this weird ping affect. If no traffic travels over the tunnel for a while (>5 minutes) I can't get from .0/24 neta(east) to .1/24 netb(west) till after I send some traffic from west to east first. Once I do that, everything else works fine. Is there soemthing, that someone could think of, that I should check? TIA Steve _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
