Scott, please explain yourself. 4 seems wasteful. Long lines are considered harmful, no matter how wide your average screen. Have you read the Times lately?
On 2006-07-25, at 13:36 EDT, Benjamin Shine wrote: > > 4! 4! 4! > Which I only say after having Scott slap me around repeatedly for > doing it wrong. > I used to be into 3, myself. > While we're at it, DARE WE come up with a line length recommended > limit? Pablo uses > 80 and maybe you hardcore oldskoolers do, but please, have you seen > the size of the standard screen lately? Show me a coder who doesn't > have at least 1280 across and I'll show you... um. > > On Jul 25, 2006, at 7:05 AM, P T Withington wrote: > >> After the 'grand class conversion', Phil and I plan to re-indent the >> LFC sources. [Right now Phil is making the conversion trying to >> minimize the whitespace changes to make it easy to review. Once we >> have tested and verified that it all works, we plan to re-indent.] >> >> Looking over the LFC sources, we have some code that is indented with >> 4 spaces and some with 2. Do we care? My personal preference is 2 >> -- it's enough to be visually distinct without being wasteful. >> But most of the sources (and apparently most editors) default to >> 4. We >> have a change to make things uniform. >> >> Vote your choice today! >> _______________________________________________ >> Laszlo-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev > > benjamin shine > software engineer > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _______________________________________________ Laszlo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
