4! 4! 4! Which I only say after having Scott slap me around repeatedly for doing it wrong. I used to be into 3, myself. While we're at it, DARE WE come up with a line length recommended limit? Pablo uses 80 and maybe you hardcore oldskoolers do, but please, have you seen the size of the standard screen lately? Show me a coder who doesn't have at least 1280 across and I'll show you... um.
On Jul 25, 2006, at 7:05 AM, P T Withington wrote: > After the 'grand class conversion', Phil and I plan to re-indent the > LFC sources. [Right now Phil is making the conversion trying to > minimize the whitespace changes to make it easy to review. Once we > have tested and verified that it all works, we plan to re-indent.] > > Looking over the LFC sources, we have some code that is indented with > 4 spaces and some with 2. Do we care? My personal preference is 2 > -- it's enough to be visually distinct without being wasteful. But > most of the sources (and apparently most editors) default to 4. We > have a change to make things uniform. > > Vote your choice today! > _______________________________________________ > Laszlo-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev benjamin shine software engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Laszlo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
