Well I just left the case running for an hour and there is no increase in
memory footprint by Firefox, so maybe that was an unrelated issue.



On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 9:28 AM, P T Withington <[email protected]> wrote:

> What does your activity monitor think?  Maybe it is the browser that is
> bloating, not the swf player?  Maybe there is a leak in the <html>
> implementation?
>
> On 2011-05-02, at 09:13, Henry Minsky wrote:
>
> > I left my firefox running the test case last night and this morning it
> > did seem like it was very sluggish. But the memory profiler did not
> > report the flash app taking any more memory. Hmm
> >
> > On Sunday, May 1, 2011, Henry Minsky <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> I don't see anything suspicious, at least not after a few minutes.
> Screen shot attached of memory profiler
> >> It shows a flat memory usage over a period of 10 or 15 minutes. I do see
> a continuous update
> >>
> >> of the number of method closures allocated, but I think those must be
> getting gc'd because total memory usage does not budge
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 8:19 PM, P T Withington <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> On 2011-05-01, at 20:09, Henry Minsky wrote:
> >>
> >>> Oh I see you did. I will run the profiler on my test case
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Henry Minsky <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> there is some kind of memory allocation trace in the flex profiler
> view in
> >>>> Flash Builder. I will try running
> >>>> the app in it. You didn't check in the patch yet, right?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 6:02 PM, P T Withington <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Is there any sort of a leak tool that you can run on teh swf with
> your
> >>>>> test case?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I have a bad feeling, because I left your test case open last night
> and
> >>>>> when I came back my machine was totally hung.  I had to force reboot
> it to
> >>>>> get it back...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 2011-04-29, at 18:39, Henry Minsky wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Go for it
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Friday, April 29, 2011, P T Withington <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>> Scratch that.  I just tried it.  Doesn't improve things that I can
> see.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> How about I just check in with the invalidatePixelAligned chopped
> out?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 2011-04-29, at 18:24, Henry Minsky wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I think that is a good idea, I'll revert it
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Friday, April 29, 2011, P T Withington <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> One other thought:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Now that we draw more conservatively, maybe we don't need to pace
> the
> >>>>> mouse-move events?  What if we try reverting r19117?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 2011-04-29, at 15:25, Henry Minsky wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Also, subjectively I feel like doubling the frame rate makes it
> more
> >>>>>>>>>> responsive
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> LFCApplication.stage.frameRate=60
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> maybe we should make this a default? Or is that an
>  un-neighborly
> >>>>> thing for
> >>>>>>>>>> a downloaded
> >>>>>>>>>> app to do?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Henry Minsky <
> >>>>> [email protected]>wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> All the calls to   invalidatePixelAlignedChildren look like
> they
> >>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>> missing
> >>>>>>>>>>> their 'if' clause....
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> public function setY ( newy:Number ):void {
> >>>>>>>>>>>       _y = newy;
> >>>>>>>>>>>       // Box attributes get scaled
> >>>>>>>>>>>       y = newy + ((marginTop + borderTopWidth + paddingTop) *
> >>>>> scaleY);
> >>>>>>>>>>>       { invalidatePixelAlignedChildren(); }
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Henry Minsky <
> >>>>> [email protected]>wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> When I stub out the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> function invalidatePixelAlignedChildren () {
> >>>>>>>>>>>>       return;
> >>> --
> >> Henry Minsky
> >> Software Architect
> >> [email protected]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Henry Minsky
> > Software Architect
> > [email protected]
>
>


-- 
Henry Minsky
Software Architect
[email protected]

Reply via email to