I left my firefox running the test case last night and this morning it did seem like it was very sluggish. But the memory profiler did not report the flash app taking any more memory. Hmm
On Sunday, May 1, 2011, Henry Minsky <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't see anything suspicious, at least not after a few minutes. Screen > shot attached of memory profiler > It shows a flat memory usage over a period of 10 or 15 minutes. I do see a > continuous update > > of the number of method closures allocated, but I think those must be getting > gc'd because total memory usage does not budge > > > On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 8:19 PM, P T Withington <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks! > > On 2011-05-01, at 20:09, Henry Minsky wrote: > >> Oh I see you did. I will run the profiler on my test case >> >> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Henry Minsky <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> there is some kind of memory allocation trace in the flex profiler view in >>> Flash Builder. I will try running >>> the app in it. You didn't check in the patch yet, right? >>> >>> >>> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 6:02 PM, P T Withington <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Is there any sort of a leak tool that you can run on teh swf with your >>>> test case? >>>> >>>> I have a bad feeling, because I left your test case open last night and >>>> when I came back my machine was totally hung. I had to force reboot it to >>>> get it back... >>>> >>>> On 2011-04-29, at 18:39, Henry Minsky wrote: >>>> >>>>> Go for it >>>>> >>>>> On Friday, April 29, 2011, P T Withington <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> Scratch that. I just tried it. Doesn't improve things that I can see. >>>>>> >>>>>> How about I just check in with the invalidatePixelAligned chopped out? >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2011-04-29, at 18:24, Henry Minsky wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I think that is a good idea, I'll revert it >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Friday, April 29, 2011, P T Withington <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> One other thought: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Now that we draw more conservatively, maybe we don't need to pace the >>>> mouse-move events? What if we try reverting r19117? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2011-04-29, at 15:25, Henry Minsky wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Also, subjectively I feel like doubling the frame rate makes it more >>>>>>>>> responsive >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> LFCApplication.stage.frameRate=60 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> maybe we should make this a default? Or is that an un-neighborly >>>> thing for >>>>>>>>> a downloaded >>>>>>>>> app to do? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Henry Minsky < >>>> [email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> All the calls to invalidatePixelAlignedChildren look like they >>>> are >>>>>>>>>> missing >>>>>>>>>> their 'if' clause.... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> public function setY ( newy:Number ):void { >>>>>>>>>> _y = newy; >>>>>>>>>> // Box attributes get scaled >>>>>>>>>> y = newy + ((marginTop + borderTopWidth + paddingTop) * >>>> scaleY); >>>>>>>>>> { invalidatePixelAlignedChildren(); } >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Henry Minsky < >>>> [email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> When I stub out the >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> function invalidatePixelAlignedChildren () { >>>>>>>>>>> return; >>-- > Henry Minsky > Software Architect > [email protected] > > > > -- Henry Minsky Software Architect [email protected]
