Same here.  I left mine running for 3 hours, no change in memory footprint.

But suspicious that both of us had bad experiences when running overnight!

On 2011-05-02, at 11:01, Henry Minsky wrote:

> Well I just left the case running for an hour and there is no increase in
> memory footprint by Firefox, so maybe that was an unrelated issue.
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 9:28 AM, P T Withington <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> What does your activity monitor think?  Maybe it is the browser that is
>> bloating, not the swf player?  Maybe there is a leak in the <html>
>> implementation?
>> 
>> On 2011-05-02, at 09:13, Henry Minsky wrote:
>> 
>>> I left my firefox running the test case last night and this morning it
>>> did seem like it was very sluggish. But the memory profiler did not
>>> report the flash app taking any more memory. Hmm
>>> 
>>> On Sunday, May 1, 2011, Henry Minsky <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> I don't see anything suspicious, at least not after a few minutes.
>> Screen shot attached of memory profiler
>>>> It shows a flat memory usage over a period of 10 or 15 minutes. I do see
>> a continuous update
>>>> 
>>>> of the number of method closures allocated, but I think those must be
>> getting gc'd because total memory usage does not budge
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 8:19 PM, P T Withington <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> 
>>>> On 2011-05-01, at 20:09, Henry Minsky wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Oh I see you did. I will run the profiler on my test case
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Henry Minsky <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> there is some kind of memory allocation trace in the flex profiler
>> view in
>>>>>> Flash Builder. I will try running
>>>>>> the app in it. You didn't check in the patch yet, right?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 6:02 PM, P T Withington <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Is there any sort of a leak tool that you can run on teh swf with
>> your
>>>>>>> test case?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I have a bad feeling, because I left your test case open last night
>> and
>>>>>>> when I came back my machine was totally hung.  I had to force reboot
>> it to
>>>>>>> get it back...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 2011-04-29, at 18:39, Henry Minsky wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Go for it
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Friday, April 29, 2011, P T Withington <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Scratch that.  I just tried it.  Doesn't improve things that I can
>> see.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> How about I just check in with the invalidatePixelAligned chopped
>> out?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 2011-04-29, at 18:24, Henry Minsky wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I think that is a good idea, I'll revert it
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, April 29, 2011, P T Withington <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> One other thought:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Now that we draw more conservatively, maybe we don't need to pace
>> the
>>>>>>> mouse-move events?  What if we try reverting r19117?
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2011-04-29, at 15:25, Henry Minsky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, subjectively I feel like doubling the frame rate makes it
>> more
>>>>>>>>>>>> responsive
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> LFCApplication.stage.frameRate=60
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> maybe we should make this a default? Or is that an
>> un-neighborly
>>>>>>> thing for
>>>>>>>>>>>> a downloaded
>>>>>>>>>>>> app to do?
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Henry Minsky <
>>>>>>> [email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> All the calls to   invalidatePixelAlignedChildren look like
>> they
>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>> missing
>>>>>>>>>>>>> their 'if' clause....
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> public function setY ( newy:Number ):void {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>      _y = newy;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>      // Box attributes get scaled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>      y = newy + ((marginTop + borderTopWidth + paddingTop) *
>>>>>>> scaleY);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>      { invalidatePixelAlignedChildren(); }
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Henry Minsky <
>>>>>>> [email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When I stub out the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> function invalidatePixelAlignedChildren () {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>      return;
>>>>> --
>>>> Henry Minsky
>>>> Software Architect
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Henry Minsky
>>> Software Architect
>>> [email protected]
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Henry Minsky
> Software Architect
> [email protected]

Reply via email to