Hi, > /usr/share/doc/latex2html/copyright (by Nikos Drakos): > ======================================================================== > [...] > Use and copying of this software and the preparation of derivative > works based on this software are permitted, so long as the following > conditions are met: > [...] > o No fees or compensation are charged for use, copies, or > access to this software. You may charge a nominal > distribution fee for the physical act of transferring a > copy, but you may not charge for the program itself. > [...] > ======================================================================== > > Our guidelines forbid us to distribute software whose redistribution is > restricted (here: no fee is allowed at all). It would be nice to have > latex2html licensed under a free (in our sense) license, e.g. the GPL. > At least, free redistribution and modification (and in turn, its > redistribution) would be needed.
The GPL allows one to charge for the costs of making a copy, this statement say that you can charge for the copy. What is the difference? Henk ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Henk Uijterwaal Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RIPE Network Coordination Centre WWW: http://www.ripe.net/home/henk P.O.Box 10096 Singel 258 Phone: +31.20.5354414 1001 EB Amsterdam 1016 AB Amsterdam Fax: +31.20.5354445 The Netherlands The Netherlands Mobile: +31.6.55861746 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ That problem that we weren't having yesterday, is it better? (Big ISP NOC) _______________________________________________ latex2html mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/latex2html
