This is getting to be rather a nit-picking discussion but the tiny difference is clear, Nikos' agreement only allows you to charge the cost of making the copy, not to also make a profit. Of course you could give away the perl scripts and make your profit on some other file on the distribution.
I'd quite like to see latextohtml better supported in my institute our current version no longer works in the same way as the 1996 version although I am getting some help from out local guru. Have redhat suse (and/or latex2html.org) decided to no longer support gif / compressed files (presumably because of the unisys patent ?) or is this just a configuration issue ? Steve O'Neale Cern B 28 S 018 767 3041 _______________________________________________ latex2html mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/latex2html
