Hi Henk, On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 15:27, Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE-NCC) wrote: > > The difference is that many distributions are not sold just for a > > nominal fee but for profit, like SuSE or RedHat. > > I still don't get it: > > * Debian considers the GPL a free license. The GPL allows people to > charge for the costs of making a copy. > > * The statement above allows people to charge for the cost of making a > copy. > > What is the problem?
The problem is: "No fees or compensation are charged for use, copies, or access to this software.". In contrary, the GPL allows this, and we also actually require it for the mentioned reasons. bye, Roland
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ latex2html mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/latex2html
