On April 14, 2011, Robert Collins wrote: > > Unless you disagree, I'll update BugTriage and MaintenanceRotation > > schedule with my proposed link. > > I'm not sure if I agree or disagree :) - I think the key things are: > - every bug should be touched just enough to decide if its critical/high > - it should be easy to query or sort our triaged bugs > - our main web UI should not tell other folk we haven't been triaging > (and leaving a bug as e.g. 'high with status new' would leave a count > marker in the progress bar) > > I agree about with dropping INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE which we can > do very easy from both searches... though I'll note that once we fix > bug expiry it will shrink that apparent backlog very quickly. > > What do you think?
Well, incomplete bugs expire after 30 days, so it's still a long time to have dangling requests in our queue. I agree that removing INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE is the thing to do from the queries. I'm still not sure that having to visit two links really pulls its weight. -- Francis J. Lacoste [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
