On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Francis J. Lacoste <[email protected]> wrote: > > On April 14, 2011, Robert Collins wrote: >> > Unless you disagree, I'll update BugTriage and MaintenanceRotation >> > schedule with my proposed link. >> >> I'm not sure if I agree or disagree :) - I think the key things are: >> - every bug should be touched just enough to decide if its critical/high >> - it should be easy to query or sort our triaged bugs >> - our main web UI should not tell other folk we haven't been triaging >> (and leaving a bug as e.g. 'high with status new' would leave a count >> marker in the progress bar) >> >> I agree about with dropping INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE which we can >> do very easy from both searches... though I'll note that once we fix >> bug expiry it will shrink that apparent backlog very quickly. >> >> What do you think? > > Well, incomplete bugs expire after 30 days, so it's still a long time to have > dangling requests in our queue. > > I agree that removing INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE is the thing to do from the > queries. I'm still not sure that having to visit two links really pulls its > weight.
I'd like to have one link that shows both, and call it 'Needs triaged', replacing 'New' in the bug portlet, and then it would be lovely :) I think that needs a bit broader discussion though :) -Rob _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
