[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
Yeah, that was an ironic bit of timing, wasn't it? And I guess we
shouldn't minimize the fact that she and her husband DID commit crimes
and stole money from others. But I wouldn't have a problem with crediting
her for timed served on the contempt charge. I've never heard of anyone
held that long for contempt of court. Even Flea Bailey didn't get that
kind of treatment.
Bill
On Tue, 10 Mar 1998 13:05:36 -0800 Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>Hi Bill:
>
>I think that if the woman is actually guilty of stealing money or
>whatever it was she did, she should serve out her term just like
>anyone
>else.
>
>I understand too though that they are thinking of cutting her sentence
>because of what she has already served. And to be honest, I wouldn't
>really object to that either, because she doesn't seem like she would
>be
>that much of a threat to society.
>
>But as far as throwing her in jail for not cooperating with Starr, if
>what she says is true, that was really wrong. She couldn't testify
>anyway, because anything that she said wouldn't make Starr happy.
>
>Nothing like being caught between the rock and the hard place.
>
>What was so weird about this whole deal though was that Susan got out
>of
>jail the same day that her ex husband died. :(
>
>Sue
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
