Alexander Klenin wrote: > On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 01:56, Martin Friebe <laza...@mfriebe.de> wrote: > > >>> Sorry, no patch from me, but I can create an issue if you want. >>> I have no problems with a separate page, >>> but why do you reject a common list? It seems the best solution to me. >>> >>> >> Dividers initially could only be set at places where a fold ended. Now >> they can be set at places, even if the place is not configured as the >> end of a fold. So they are a separate feature. >> Divider-Locations also is a different list than Fold-Locations, so >> sharing the same list, would be confusing. >> > > Well, there are already two divider sub-kinds -- nested and normal ones. > They already display different controls (spin editor vs checkbox, > second color picker). > I suggest to add 'Fold' checkbox, in the same vein -- it will be displayed > only for foldable locations. > As I said there may be more oprtions in future, so better to keep them separated
>>> BTW, don't you think that per-type divider coloring is an overkill? >>> Perhaps a single color on Colors page would be sufficient? >>> >>> >> Not necessarily. >> For Example (I use this) I have a normal grey (same as right/80-column >> border) for procedures (procedures at top-level. >> But I use a lighter grey for nested procedures. So I can see the >> difference between nested and top level procs. >> > > No problem, but how do I globally change divider color then? > Do I have to change it for every kind of location? > > Leave them on default, and change the color of the "right margin" / " 80 char" indicator. They always used to follow the color of that, they still do. For all else, it would be cool to make the listbox multi-select => but that's a lot more work.... Anyway, thanks for the feedback, it goes into collected thought, until I decide to do something about it.... Best Regards Martin _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus