On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 01:56, Martin Friebe <laza...@mfriebe.de> wrote:
>> Sorry, no patch from me, but I can create an issue if you want. >> I have no problems with a separate page, >> but why do you reject a common list? It seems the best solution to me. >> > Dividers initially could only be set at places where a fold ended. Now > they can be set at places, even if the place is not configured as the > end of a fold. So they are a separate feature. > Divider-Locations also is a different list than Fold-Locations, so > sharing the same list, would be confusing. Well, there are already two divider sub-kinds -- nested and normal ones. They already display different controls (spin editor vs checkbox, second color picker). I suggest to add 'Fold' checkbox, in the same vein -- it will be displayed only for foldable locations. >> BTW, don't you think that per-type divider coloring is an overkill? >> Perhaps a single color on Colors page would be sufficient? >> > Not necessarily. > For Example (I use this) I have a normal grey (same as right/80-column > border) for procedures (procedures at top-level. > But I use a lighter grey for nested procedures. So I can see the > difference between nested and top level procs. No problem, but how do I globally change divider color then? Do I have to change it for every kind of location? -- Alexander S. Klenin _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
